Ireland set to vote on the Eighth Amendment

A Feature by Shauna Stanley

Three weeks from now, Ireland will have voted on whether to remove Article 40.3.3 (known as the Eighth Amendment) from the Constitution, which prohibits abortion in marchforchoicealmost all circumstances, including in cases of rape, incest and fatal foetal abnormality. Some frame the Eighth Amendment as a provision which protects the life of the unborn child in the womb. Others frame it as a Constitutional ban which prohibits women from accessing various forms of reproductive healthcare in Ireland.

The Eighth Amendment reads:

The state acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right.

The upcoming referendum on 25 May will be the sixth instance Ireland has gone to the polls on the question of abortion. The first referendum, which inserted the above article into the Constitution, was passed on 7 September 1983, with 66.9% voting in favour and 33.1% voting against. Appetite for a referendum on the issue came about in January 1981 when the Pro-Life Amendment Campaign (PLAC), was established. The launch meeting of the campaign was called by John O’Reilly, a campaigner against contraception in the 1970s. The referendum was opposed by the Anti-Amendment Campaign, for which Mary Robinson was a spokesperson.

Between the initial insertion of the Eighth into the Constitution in 1983 and the current proposed removal, there have been four additional referenda pertaining to abortion – two which passed, and two which failed. In 1992 the Irish public voted on three amendments on the same day. The Thirteenth Amendment passed by a majority of 62.39%. It expressly states the Eighth Amendment ‘shall not limit freedom to travel between the State and another state.’ This means that women in Ireland can travel abroad to have an abortion if they wish. In addition, the Fourteenth Amendment was passed by a majority of 59.88%. It provides a limited right to distribute information of ‘services lawfully available in other states.’ This means anyone can provide women in Ireland with information on abortion clinics abroad, but there is a ban on providing information about procuring abortions in Ireland. The Twelfth Amendment held on the same day in 1992 asked whether to exclude the risk of suicide as grounds for legal abortion. This was rejected in 1992 by 65.35%. This referendum was effectively put to vote again in 2002 (as the Twenty-fifth Amendment) but was rejected by a margin of 50.42%.

The Current Campaign – Competing Visions

The most immediate reason for the upcoming referendum, the Citizens’ Assembly, was made up of 99 randomly selected citizens and considered the case for and against having a referendum on the Eighth during seven months of deliberations chaired by former Supreme Court Judge Mary Laffoy. In April 2017 they recommended by majority that the government should hold a referendum to replace the Eighth Amendment with an enabling provision to allow for wider access to abortion in Ireland. The Bill tabling the referendum was passed through the government in March 2018, but the May referendum could be seen as the culmination of 35 years of campaigning and a line of high-profile cases transpiring from the Eighth Amendment.

  • The X Case: In 1992 the Supreme Court established the right to access abortion in life-threatening circumstances, such as the risk of suicide. X was a 14-year-old who became pregnant as a result of rape and became suicidal. Her mother planned to take her to the UK for an abortion, but the Attorney General was notified and instituted an injunction against her travelling. This case resulted in the constitutional right to travel abroad for an abortion, but it took 20 years for the government to ‘Legislate for X’, and not before the death of Savita Halappanavar.
  • Death of Savita Halappanavar: In October 2012 Savita Halappanavar was admitted to hospital experiencing complications in her pregnancy. She requested an abortion when it became apparent she was having a miscarriage, but she was refused; five days later she died as a result of septic miscarriage. Her death directly resulted in the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act 2013 (‘the 2013 Act’), the current legislation regulating abortion in Ireland.
  • PP v HSE: In November 2014 a woman who had been admitted to hospital with headaches and nausea suffered a fall in hospital and went into a coma. She was declared brain-dead but kept on life support because she was 12-weeks pregnant, disregarding the fact her family wished for the life support to be switched off. A special sitting of the Supreme Court on Stephens’ Day determined that her life support could be switched off. The ruling in this case highlighted that the Eighth amendment was about more than abortion, and also showed the complexities of placing such a provision in the Constitution, necessitating the Supreme Court to make a decision perhaps more suited to a doctor.
  • Whelan v Ireland: In June 2017, the United Nations Human Rights Committee ruled that Ireland’s abortion law violated Siobhan Whelan’s human rights when she requested an abortion due to fatal foetal abnormality, but was refused the procedure in Ireland. She subsequently travelled abroad to have an abortion. The UN found that, in the circumstances of Siobhan Whelan’s case, being compelled to travel for an abortion is in violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, subjecting Whelan to a ‘cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment’, and recommended Ireland legalise abortion.

After the death of Savita Halappanavar in 2012, a pro-choice group called the Abortion Rights Campaign began holding an annual March for Choice in Dublin. This grassroots campaign has been at the forefront pressuring for constitutional and legislative change with the 2017 March for Choice with a reported estimate turnout of 40,000 people. In addition, a number of solidarity gatherings were held abroad on the same day, including in Melbourne, Darwin, Perth and Sydney.

The Yes campaign is being led by Together for Yes, a group consisting of three organisations – the Coalition to Repeal the Eighth Amendment, National Women’s Council of Ireland, and the Abortion Rights Campaign. The Yes campaign argues that abortion should be treated as a private matter between a woman and her doctor. The campaign argues that this goal only be facilitated by the wider public’s support in overturning the Eighth. Their slogan, ‘Sometimes a Private Matter Needs Public Support,’ captures this sentiment. The Yes campaign is arguing for a compassionate healthcare system in Ireland where women are truly allowed to discuss their options with their doctor. Together for Yes also maintains that the referendum is about not only abortion, but prenatal healthcare options generally available to women in Ireland. If a medical problem develops during pregnancy, a doctor has to put the wellbeing of the foetus before the health and wellbeing of the pregnant woman, which may result in delays in healthcare and subsequent death – such as in the case of Savita Halappanavar.

The No campaign is being led by Save the Eighth, a group formed by the Pro-Life Campaign Ireland, which is an organisation that can trace its roots to PLAC from the ’80s. rallyforlifeThe Pro-Life Campaign Ireland became active in response to the X Case, campaigning against the right to travel and the right to information. Save the Eighth maintain that ‘a vote for repeal is a vote for abortion on demand.’ From the No campaign’s perspective, removing the Eighth removes constitutional protection from the unborn, and legalising abortion infringes the right to life of the unborn. The Rally for Life has been held in Dublin annually since 2006, most recently in July 2017, with a reported estimate of 50,000 people in attendance.

What might happen after the referendum?

Voting is not compulsory in Ireland as it is in Australia, so voter turnout will have a large part to play in the result. Historically, abortion referenda have been amongst the lowest turnouts in Ireland. For the 1983 referendum, only 53.67% of the electorate actually voted. It remains to be seen whether the referendum on 25 May will mark a departure from this trend.

In the event of a Yes vote, the Eighth Amendment, along with the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments, would be together repealed and replaced by the following text:

Provision may be made by law for the regulation of termination of pregnancy.

Immediately after the referendum, the current law, the 2013 Act, would remain in place. This allows for abortion where the mother’s life is at risk, including suicide. If a woman or a doctor procures an abortion outside these parameters, they can receive a maximum 14-year prison sentence if convicted. The 2013 Act does not allow for abortion in any other circumstances such as rape, incest, fatal foetal abnormality, risk to health or economic reasons.

If the Eighth Amendment is repealed, it will allow the Irish government to legislate on abortion in these other circumstances. Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil, the major political parties in the Oireachtas (the Irish Parliament), are allowing members to take a free position on the issue, while Sinn Féin and Labour and other smaller parties are officially backing a Yes vote. The draft legislation proposed by Health Minister Simon Harris is based on the recommendations of the Citizens’ Assembly, and would allow abortion up to 12 weeks in all circumstances. Such abortions would be carried out by a medical practitioner who would first discuss the woman’s options with her. Then after a mandatory 72-hour waiting period the doctor would administer an abortion pill. The proposed legislation allows for abortion after 12 weeks only where the health or life of the mother is endangered, or in cases where the foetus has a condition where it will not survive outside of the womb or will die shortly after birth. Medical practitioners would be allowed to conscientiously object to providing an abortion.

If the referendum passes, abortion will still be illegal in Northern Ireland. The Abortion Act 1967 which paved the way for access to abortion in the United Kingdom does not apply to Northern Ireland. Abortion in Northern Ireland is criminalised under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, with a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

Irish Abroad and the Referendum

Irish citizens abroad cannot vote in the upcoming referendum as is there no system of postal voting in Ireland for citizens abroad. This means there are a lot of Irish abroad who are feeling disenfranchised, particularly when postal voting is available to citizens of 120 other countries (including Australia).

Many Irish people abroad are going home to vote, similar to the #HomeToVote phenomenon that occurred during the 2015 Marriage Equality Referendum. Only those who are still on the register and have been away for less than 18 months are eligible to cast their vote after making the journey home. A Facebook page ‘Abroad for Yes’ has been set up to assist Irish students living abroad to come home for the referendum.

An Irish-Australian group Irish Pro Choice in Oz, based in Melbourne, has set up a campaign ‘Diaspora Downunder Dollars for Choice’, to encourage the Irish in Australia to host events and fundraisers to engage with the referendum. Events have been organised in Melbourne, Sydney, Darwin and Brisbane including a pub quiz, a gig and multiple film screenings to fundraise for Together for Yes and other pro-choice organisations which assist Irish women. No similar campaign group arguing for the preservation of the amendment has been formed in Australia.

Has the Eighth prevented abortion?

Statistics suggest 170,252 women travelled to the United Kingdom and the Netherlands between 1980 – 2016 to avail of abortion. This figure is a combination of the UK Department of Health’s report that a total of 168,705 women who availed of abortion in the UK reported an Irish address. In Ireland, the HSE’s Crisis Pregnancy Programme, which collects data on the number of women who gave Irish addresses at abortion clinics in the Netherlands, reported 1,547 Irish women travelled to the Netherlands for an abortion between 2005 – 2016. In Ireland, under the current 2013 Act, 77 legal abortions have been carried out due to the mother’s life being endangered, for the period 2014 – 2016.

These figures do not account for those who wish to end a pregnancy due to rape, incest, fatal foetal abnormality or economic reasons but cannot afford to travel, or cannot travel due to ill-health, domestic violence or because they are an asylum seeker. Abortion pills such as mifepristone and misoprostol are already in circulation in Ireland, and possession of these pills is not illegal. However any person caught taking mifepristone or misoprostol to terminate a pregnancy can receive up to 14 years in prison. Between 2010 – 2015, Women on Web reported that 5,650 women in Ireland requested abortion pills through their online medical advice service which distributes abortion pills around the world. In that same timeframe, 4,098 abortion pills were seized in Ireland by Revenue. This means the Eighth Amendment has not actually prevented abortion from happening in Ireland – rather, it appears to criminalise those who are not able to travel.

Undoubtedly, the Eighth Amendment has restricted women from accessing abortion services. Yet abortions still happen in Ireland, albeit in very restrictive circumstances. What would happen if Ireland votes No? The Eighth Amendment will continue to operate – and women who live in Ireland will continue to travel abroad or use abortion pills in Ireland illegally. This referendum is then about making such healthcare options legally and safely available to Irish women in their home country.

Shauna Stanley

Shauna is a member of the Tinteán Collective, having completed a Law Degree at Trinity College Dublin before coming to Australia.

One thought on “Ireland set to vote on the Eighth Amendment

  1. Reading this takes me back to the 1980s and 1990s when I lived in Ireland and saw the anguish and pain wrought on friends and neighbours by the inflexible and punitive approach to family law and related areas. The girl at the centre of case X went to school down the road with girls who had been fellow students of my children at their primary school. The delay imposed on this child by the ban on her travel to Britain while her case went to the European Court meant she had the extra trauma of a late abortion. Britain was still in the EU so the European Court ruled against Ireland preventing the free travel between two member states. Presumably after Brexit this will no longer be an optional route.
    The whole calamity of contraception and the Irish law was also distressing. Even after contraception was legalised and I was able to find a GP prepared to prescribe the pill not one of the five chemists in my suburb would fill the prescription. I lived in middle-class Dublin 6 not a rural village. Luckily for me, the Well Woman Centre was prepared to dispense (and also condoms which required a prescription). One Kildare doctor flouted the condom law and challenged them to prosecute him because he dispensed condoms as well as prescribing them. He was also prepared to tie women’s tubes, another legal grey area, supported by a doctor who took the ferry from Wales to Dun Laoghaire every week to perform the same operation. They were the only two prepared to run the gauntlet. This went on for years and was compounded when the Protestant hospitals were subsumed into the bigger Catholic ones by the early 1990s.
    And don’t get me started on divorce and the unhappiness caused to many by being forced to live in ‘irregular’ long-term relationships. Even when foreign divorces followed by foreign registry office second marriages were recognised and one no longer ran the risk of being prosecuted for bigamy, there was still the problem of the first child born before the second marriage and regarded as ‘illegitimate’ and not on an equal footing with his ‘legitimate’ siblings. The solution could have been to adopt the child but this came a cropper as adoptions were not permitted to ‘mixed-marriages’. The couple, even if adopting their own child, had to be the same religion.
    Such were the joys of family law in Ireland as it affected some friends of mine.
    My unsung hero in family law is Alan Shatter, the Fine Gael deputy, who began to work on reform of the legislation. He set up the financial and custody aspects of legal separation in such a way as when Divorce was finally allowed in the 1990s, the mechanisms had been set in place and people who had already sorted their legal separation could get their divorces through much faster.
    I will keep my fingers crossed for the vote on 25 May. I remember my 3 year old daughter in 1983 marching alongside us as we went to vote against putting the abortion ban into the constitution declaiming ‘Vote No, Vote No’ – She is now 38. At the time, I thought it a terrible idea putting such a matter into the constitution when a country could legislate against it anyway.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s